On Sun 2018-04-15 11:00:06, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Ok, let me try to bisect it. Compile-problem should be easy... > >> > >> Hmm. And as it is compile-problem in single file, it should even be > >> reasonably fast. I did not realize how easy it would be: > >> > >> #!/bin/bash > >> set -e > >> cp config.ok .config > >> yes '' | ARCH=arm make lib/string.o > >> > >> And the winner is: > >> > >> ee333554fed55555a986a90bb097ac7f9d6f05bf is the first bad commit > >> commit ee333554fed55555a986a90bb097ac7f9d6f05bf > >> Author: Jinbum Park <[email protected]> > >> Date: Tue Mar 6 01:39:24 2018 +0100 > > ... > > > >> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Jinbum Park <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]> > > > > So I bisect a problem in -next, and patch is merged to Linus, > > _anyway_, breaking compilation there? Neither Jinbum nor Russell even > > bother to comment. > > Hi! Sorry I lost this email in my inbox. It seems this is specific to > a particular subset of arm architectures? (My local builds of arm all > succeed, for example. Can you send your failing config?) I'll take a > closer look on Monday if Daniel doesn't beat me to it.
Daniel, Kees: any news?
I'm aware you did not specify which Monday :-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
