Quentin,
Am Freitag, 20. April 2018, 10:52:41 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> There's already ECC on NAND pages so there may be no need for one to
> check the CRC of a UBI volume.
>
> Let's introduce a ubi.nocheck parameter that let one skip the CRC check
> when attaching a UBI volume.
>
> This also drastically speeds kernel boot by removing a potentially
> useless check, e.g. I gained 3.2s on boot time of a SPEAr600-based board
> for a ~20MB UBI volume used as rootfs.
You mean at *open* time of a *static* UBI volume?
So I guess the use case is having a read-only filesystem on top of ubiblock?
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 6 ++++-
> drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> index d4b2e87..d604cd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
> #include <asm/div64.h>
> #include "ubi.h"
>
> +struct ubivol_param ubinocheck_param[UBIVOL_MAX_DEVICES];
> +int ubinocheck_devs;
> +
> /**
> * ubi_do_get_device_info - get information about UBI device.
> * @ubi: UBI device description object
> @@ -865,3 +868,70 @@ int ubi_unregister_volume_notifier(struct notifier_block
> *nb)
> return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&ubi_notifiers, nb);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ubi_unregister_volume_notifier);
> +
> +static int __init ubinocheckvol_set_param(const char *val,
> + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> +{
> + int i, ret;
> + size_t len;
> + struct ubivol_param *param;
> + char buf[UBIVOL_PARAM_LEN];
> + char *pbuf = &buf[0];
> + char *tokens[UBIVOL_PARAM_COUNT];
> +
> + if (!val)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + len = strnlen(val, UBIVOL_PARAM_LEN);
> + if (len == 0) {
> + pr_warn("UBI: nocheck: empty 'nocheck=' parameter - ignored\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (len == UBIVOL_PARAM_LEN) {
> + pr_err("UBI: nocheck: parameter \"%s\" is too long, max. is
> %d\n",
> + val, UBIVOL_PARAM_LEN);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + strcpy(buf, val);
> +
> + /* Get rid of the final newline */
> + if (buf[len - 1] == '\n')
> + buf[len - 1] = '\0';
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < UBIVOL_PARAM_COUNT; i++)
> + tokens[i] = strsep(&pbuf, ",");
> +
> + param = &ubinocheck_param[ubinocheck_devs];
> + if (tokens[1]) {
> + /* Two parameters: can be 'ubi, vol_id' or 'ubi, vol_name' */
> + ret = kstrtoint(tokens[0], 10, ¶m->ubi_num);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Second param can be a number or a name */
> + ret = kstrtoint(tokens[1], 10, ¶m->vol_id);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + param->vol_id = -1;
> + strcpy(param->name, tokens[1]);
> + }
> + }
>
Do we really need this per volume? If your flash is trustworthy, it should not
matter.
Having it per UBI instance instead of volume would make the code less
complicated.
> + ubinocheck_devs++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct kernel_param_ops ubinocheckvol_param_ops = {
> + .set = ubinocheckvol_set_param,
> +};
> +module_param_cb(nocheck, &ubinocheckvol_param_ops, NULL, 0);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(nocheck,
> + "Disable CRC check for UBI volumes. Parameter format:
> nocheck=dev,[num|name]>.\n"
> + "Multiple \"nocheck\" parameters may be specified.\n"
> + "Examples\n"
> + "Using the UBI device, and the volume name:\n"
> + "ubi.nocheck=0,rootfs\n"
> + "Using both UBI device number and UBI volume number:\n"
> + "ubi.nocheck=0,0\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
> index 4cc6ec9..2bd89b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
> @@ -825,6 +825,12 @@ struct ubivol_param {
> char name[UBIVOL_PARAM_LEN + 1];
> };
>
> +/* Numbers of elements set in the @ubinocheck_param array */
> +extern int ubinocheck_devs;
> +
> +/* MTD devices specification parameters */
> +extern struct ubivol_param ubinocheck_param[UBIVOL_MAX_DEVICES];
> +
> #include "debug.h"
>
> extern struct kmem_cache *ubi_wl_entry_slab;
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
> index 263743e..06b6cfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c
> @@ -534,9 +534,10 @@ static int init_volumes(struct ubi_device *ubi,
> const struct ubi_attach_info *ai,
> const struct ubi_vtbl_record *vtbl)
> {
> - int i, reserved_pebs = 0;
> + int i, j, reserved_pebs = 0;
> struct ubi_ainf_volume *av;
> struct ubi_volume *vol;
> + struct ubivol_param *param;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ubi->vtbl_slots; i++) {
> cond_resched();
> @@ -620,6 +621,27 @@ static int init_volumes(struct ubi_device *ubi,
> (long long)(vol->used_ebs - 1) * vol->usable_leb_size;
> vol->used_bytes += av->last_data_size;
> vol->last_eb_bytes = av->last_data_size;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < ubinocheck_devs; j++) {
> + param = &ubinocheck_param[j];
> +
> + if (vol->ubi->ubi_num != param->ubi_num)
> + continue;
> + if (vol->vol_id == param->vol_id) {
> + ubi_msg(vol->ubi,
> + "skipping CRC check for volume %d",
> + vol->vol_id);
> + vol->checked = true;
Please don't abuse the checked flag.
A new one a la "skip_check" does not hurt.
But again, I don't think we need it per volume.
Also don't forget to add the nocheck parameter to the ioctl() interface, such
that
you can specify it also with ubiattach...
Thanks,
//richard
