Tejun Heo napsal(a): > Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Yes. Now I'm compiling -rc4-mm2. > > It's probably caused by new sysfs slimdown patches and I'm pretty sure > -rc4-mm2 would fail the same way. The offending one should be one of > the following patches.
There's reverted gregkh-driver-block-device in -mm2. So I wanted to give it a try. Do you think it's pointless and that patch has no impact on the behaviour? > gregkh-driver-sysfs-fix-parent-refcounting-during-rename-and-move.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-reorganize-sysfs_new_indoe-and-sysfs_create.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-iget_locked-instead-of-new_inode.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-fix-root-sysfs_dirent-root-dentry-association.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-move-s_active-functions-to-fs-sysfs-dirc.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-slim-down-sysfs_dirent-s_active.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch > > Can you bisect the above patches? Sure, in 12 hours or tomorrow. thanks, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint: B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
