From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com>

Since commit 83a86fbb5b56 ("irqchip/gic: Loudly complain about the use of 
IRQ_TYPE_NONE")
kernel is complaining about the IRQ_TYPE_NONE usage which shouldn't
be used.

Use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH instead.

Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi
index c67edb1a8121..4dedfcb0fcb3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi
@@ -154,8 +154,8 @@
                        reg             = <0x08a20000 0x10000>,
                                          <0x08a00000 0x4000>;
                        reg-names       = "c8sectpfe", "c8sectpfe-ram";
-                       interrupts      = <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
-                                         <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
+                       interrupts      = <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+                                         <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
                        interrupt-names = "c8sectpfe-error-irq",
                                          "c8sectpfe-idle-irq";
                        pinctrl-0       = <&pinctrl_tsin0_serial>;
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to