On 04/20/18 09:36, Roman Gushchin wrote:

> ---
>  Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt  | 20 +++++++++
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h   | 15 ++++++-
>  include/linux/page_counter.h | 11 ++++-
>  mm/memcontrol.c              | 99 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  mm/page_counter.c            | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  mm/vmscan.c                  | 19 ++++++++-
>  6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
> index 657fe1769c75..49c846020f96 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
> @@ -1002,6 +1002,26 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
>       The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
>       and its descendants.
>  
> +  memory.min
> +     A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
> +     cgroups.  The default is "0".
> +
> +     Hard memory protection.  If the memory usage of a cgroup
> +     is within its effectife min boundary, the cgroup's memory

                      effective

> +     won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
> +     unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
> +     is invoked.
> +
> +     Effective low boundary is limited by memory.min values of
> +     all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.mn overcommitment

                                          memory.min ? overcommit

> +     (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory,

                                                  drop ending ','  ^^

> +     than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
> +     the part of parent's protection proportional to the its

                                                     to its

> +     actual memory usage below memory.min.
> +
> +     Putting more memory than generally available under this
> +     protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
> +
>    memory.low
>       A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
>       cgroups.  The default is "0".


-- 
~Randy

Reply via email to