On 4/24/2018 2:53 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20:14AM -0700, kan.li...@linux.intel.com escreveu:
From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@linux.intel.com>

PMU name is printed repeatedly for interval print, for example:

   perf stat --no-merge -e 'unc_m_clockticks' -a -I 1000
   #           time             counts unit events
      1.001053069        243,702,144      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_4]
      1.001053069        244,268,304      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_2]
      1.001053069        244,427,386      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_0]
      1.001053069        244,583,760      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_5]
      1.001053069        244,738,971      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_3]
      1.001053069        244,880,309      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_1]
      2.002024821        240,818,200      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_4] 
[uncore_imc_4]
      2.002024821        240,767,812      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_2] 
[uncore_imc_2]
      2.002024821        240,764,215      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_0] 
[uncore_imc_0]
      2.002024821        240,759,504      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_5] 
[uncore_imc_5]
      2.002024821        240,755,992      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_3] 
[uncore_imc_3]
      2.002024821        240,750,403      unc_m_clockticks [uncore_imc_1] 
[uncore_imc_1]

For each print, the PMU name is unconditionally appended to the
counter->name.
Need to check the counter->name first. If the PMU name is already
appended, do nothing.

Fixes: 8c5421c016a4 ("perf pmu: Display pmu name when printing unmerged events in 
stat")
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -1296,6 +1296,8 @@ static void uniquify_event_name(struct perf_evsel 
*counter)
                        counter->name = new_name;
                }
        } else {
+               if (strstr(counter->name, counter->pmu_name))
+                       return;
                if (asprintf(&new_name,
                             "%s [%s]", counter->name, counter->pmu_name) > 0) {
                        free(counter->name);

Humm, do you have any problem with the patch below instead?

No. The patch as below looks good to me.

Thanks,
Kan


diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index 2137c7d11767..8518342c5466 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -1261,7 +1261,8 @@ static void uniquify_event_name(struct perf_evsel 
*counter)
        char *new_name;
        char *config;
- if (!counter->pmu_name || !strncmp(counter->name, counter->pmu_name,
+       if (counter->uniquified_name ||
+           !counter->pmu_name || !strncmp(counter->name, counter->pmu_name,
                                           strlen(counter->pmu_name)))
                return;
@@ -1279,6 +1280,8 @@ static void uniquify_event_name(struct perf_evsel *counter)
                        counter->name = new_name;
                }
        }
+
+       counter->uniquified_name = true;
  }
static void collect_all_aliases(struct perf_evsel *counter,
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index d3ee3af618ef..92ec009a292d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct perf_evsel {
        unsigned int            sample_size;
        int                     id_pos;
        int                     is_pos;
+       bool                    uniquified_name;
        bool                    snapshot;
        bool                    supported;
        bool                    needs_swap;

Reply via email to