On 04/24/2018 05:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:41:16PM -0700, subhra mazumdar wrote:+ if (per_cpu(next_cpu, target) != -1) + target_tmp = per_cpu(next_cpu, target); + else + target_tmp = target; +This one; what's the point here?
Want to start search from target first time and from the next_cpu next time onwards. If this doesn't many any difference in performance I can change it. Will require re-running all the tests.
