On Jun 8 2007 01:06, Oleg Verych wrote:
>- empty lines in the end of file (patches can't be handled, or can? :). Yes it can. >Body -- is a commented sed script with shell variables for source/patch >handling switch and compatibility with other versions of sed, not only GNU. >If you like more tabs, then i stated in whitespace damage, just use >"unexpand". sed just does not cut it anymore. Perl regexes win in the long term. >> Yes, UNIX was designed to handle fork-exec efficiently, thank God. But >> still. >[] >> > efforts to remove bashizms... >> >> I prefer bashisms over using a shell [referring to original sh or ksh] >> that can't do a sane thing. > >I would like to know cases. Just to try to solve them. > >Two from my head are: > >- `set pipefail' option -- not problem at all [0] >- arrays. > >Arrays. Well, that depends. My option is as follows. If you need arrays or a lot of substr magic, well, it's perhaps time to consider a switch to a scripted language (perl, python, php, whatever comes around). But I really meant these handy bash features: for i in {1..5}; do ...; done; if [ ]; then ...; fi; echo $[ math expr ]; echo `backtick` and $(backtick with dollar-parentheses); The possibility to say if [ "$any" == "" ] (not having to use crap like [ "x$any" == "x" ]. The possibility to say if [ -z "$any" ] On the other hand, if you wanted to extinguish bashisms, then you'd also need to do so for kshisms like if [[ ]] >OK, to not to go offtopic, i would say here, that if that temp file on the >tmpfs, then Linux directly helps you with its efficient memory >management, not libc (good addition to fork/clone-execve, isn't it? ;) And don't assume everything is a UNIX. CreateProcess() is particularly expensive on Windows, burdening even Cygwin's fork()/exec() emulation. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/