Using initcall_t in the __field macro generates the follwing warning
with clang version 6.0:

include/trace/events/initcall.h:34:3: warning: ordered comparison of
function pointers ('initcall_t' (aka 'int (*)(void)') and 'initcall_t')

__field macro expands to __field_ext macro which does is_signed_type
check on the type argument. Since initcall_t is defined as a function
pointer, using it as the type in the __field macro, leads to an ordered
comparison of function pointer warning, inside the check. Using
__field_struct macro avoids the issue.

Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <[email protected]>
---
 include/trace/events/initcall.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/initcall.h b/include/trace/events/initcall.h
index 8d6cf10..46f5f7c 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/initcall.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/initcall.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
        TP_ARGS(func),
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
-               __field(initcall_t, func)
+               __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
        ),
 
        TP_fast_assign(
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
        TP_ARGS(func, ret),
 
        TP_STRUCT__entry(
-               __field(initcall_t,     func)
+               __field_struct(initcall_t,      func)
                __field(int,            ret)
        ),
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to