On 04/25/2018 04:19 PM, Martin Vuille wrote: > Apologies for any problems my patch may be causing. > > I'm unclear on what is the proposed fix, other than reverting the commit. > > In the problem scenario, is a --symfs option used? Is the debug info being > obtained from the symfs directory? > > Unfortunately, I've had to change my focus for the time being, so won't be > able to investigate further for a while. > > Arnaldo, I'm fine with you reverting this change for now. > > Regards, > > MV > >
Martin, there is no need to revert the patch. I have adopted the test case for s390 and it now stops at main, which is identical to x86. The --symfs option was not used, however the debug file selected for dwarf examination was different. With you patch it changed from /usr/lib64/libc.so (old) to /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.26.so.debug (new) and I think that this file has not all the info (at least on s390). -- Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany -- Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
