Next patch introduces nolock variant of this label, so we will have new_owner and new_owner_nolock. assign_new_owner_nolock would be too long there.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@virtuozzo.com> --- kernel/exit.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 5c42a9b9c1d7..40f734ed1193 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm) */ list_for_each_entry(c, &p->children, sibling) { if (c->mm == mm) - goto assign_new_owner; + goto new_owner; } /* @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm) */ list_for_each_entry(c, &p->real_parent->children, sibling) { if (c->mm == mm) - goto assign_new_owner; + goto new_owner; } /* @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm) continue; for_each_thread(g, c) { if (c->mm == mm) - goto assign_new_owner; + goto new_owner; if (c->mm) break; } @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->owner = NULL; return; -assign_new_owner: +new_owner: rcu_read_lock(); read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); BUG_ON(c == p);