Christoph Hellwig wrote:
And for thus just wanting to take a quick glance, this is the
diff vs an out of tree cramfs where uncompress.c and cramfs_fs_sb.h
are merged into inode.c:
Mkay, I am convinced. Either cramfs should be based on a block device
that does have direct_access() for xip, or the code needs to be
forked. Looks like a sane approach to me.
so long,
Carsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
