-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
---------------------

From: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It is a known fact that freezeable multithreaded workqueues doesn't like
CPU_DEAD. We keep them only for the incoming CPU-hotplug rework.

Sadly, we can't just kill create_freezeable_workqueue() right now, make
them singlethread.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.21.4.orig/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ linux-2.6.21.4/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *__create
                                                    int singlethread,
                                                    int freezeable);
 #define create_workqueue(name) __create_workqueue((name), 0, 0)
-#define create_freezeable_workqueue(name) __create_workqueue((name), 0, 1)
+#define create_freezeable_workqueue(name) __create_workqueue((name), 1, 1)
 #define create_singlethread_workqueue(name) __create_workqueue((name), 1, 0)
 
 extern void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq);

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to