On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:28:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:44:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Then again, it's a better strategy than trying to read the code ;) > > > > Please, tell us what it does, so that we can decide whether we want it in > > Linux. > > It does the same as cleanfile.pl. > I have seen no reason to replace cleanfile.pl with this version.
It does better whitespace cleanup, than scripts/{cleanfile *and* cleanpatch} togather with more user, operating system kernel-friendly approach. Please, test it on proposed testcase - ipv6.h, and you will see, what i'm talking about. Patch description + script name is all one must to know to start use it *safely*. > Linecount is down but so is maintainability / extendability. Really? If you think so... For those, who have (X)emacs on board, i recommend "develock.el" as good damage-showing tool. Sorry, Andrew, for garbage in you patch subject filters :) ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/