On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > > if you don't agree with that patch, fine. but suggesting that it's > > going to result in "a mass of unresolvable dependancy loops" is sheer > > laziness. > > No its "sheer experience", frequently painful. The tty headers and > the scheduler headers are particularly problematic for getting > tangled.
ok, i'll defer to your experience. but can we at least apply my patch to protect console_struct.h from multiple inclusion? that one really *is* annoying. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
