On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:35 PM Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:33:39PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote: > > INFINIBAND_SRPT code depends on INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS provided symbols. > > So declare the kconfig dependency. This is necessary to allow for > > enabling INFINIBAND without INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthe...@google.com> > > Cc: Tarick Bedeir <tar...@google.com> > > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/Kconfig > > index 31ee83d528d9..fb8b7182f05e 100644 > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/Kconfig > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > config INFINIBAND_SRPT > > tristate "InfiniBand SCSI RDMA Protocol target support" > > - depends on INFINIBAND && TARGET_CORE > > + depends on INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS && TARGET_CORE > Isn't INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS a bit redundant? Can't have > INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS without INFINIBAND. By kconfig INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS depends on INFINIBAND. So yes, it seems redundant. I don't know if anyone has designs to break this dependency and allow for ADDR_TRANS without INFINIBAND. Assuming not, I'd be willing to amend my series removing redundant INFINIBAND and a followup series to remove it from similar depends. Though I'm not familiar with rdma dev tree lifecycle. Is rdma/for-rc a throw away branch (akin to linux-next), or will it be merged into linus/master? If throwaway, then we can amend its patches, otherwise followups will be needed. Let me know what you'd prefer. Thanks. FYI from v4.17-rc3: drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/Kconfig: depends on LNET && PCI && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS net/9p/Kconfig: depends on INET && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS net/rds/Kconfig: depends on RDS && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS net/sunrpc/Kconfig: depends on SUNRPC && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS
