On 5/1/2018 6:49 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On 5/1/2018 5:01 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Let me ponder what the best solution is, it's a bit of a mess.

So there's:

  - TASK_PARKED, which we can make a special state; this solves the
    problem because then wait_task_inactive() is guaranteed to see
    TASK_PARKED and DTRT.

Yes this should work, as it takes pi-lock and blocking kthread_parkme.

  - complete(&kthread->parked), which we can do inside schedule(); this
    solves the problem because then kthread_park() will not return early
    and the task really is blocked.

I think complete will not help, as problem is like below :

Control Thread                                CPUHP thread
                                        
                                              cpuhp_thread_fun
                                              Wake control thread
                                              complete(&st->done);

takedown_cpu
kthread_park
set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK

                                             Here cpuhp is looping,
                                        //success case
                                             Generally when issue is not
                                             coming
                                             it schedule out by below :
                                           ht->thread_should_run(td->cpu
                                              scheduler
                                        //failure case
                                        before schedule
                                        loop check
                                        (kthread_should_park()
                                         enter here as PARKED set

wake_up_process(k)
                                        __kthread_parkme
                                         complete(&self->parked);
SETS RUNNING
                                         schedule                       
wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);


So even we protect complete, it may see TASK_RUNNING as final state.
That's why we took pi-lock , So wake_up_process either see TASK_RUNNING
so return or it will exit early before parkme call.

Please correct me , if i misunderstood it. With pi-lock approach we are not seeing issue. SO you first solution should fix this(put parked in special state).

Regards
Gaurav
                                        


and I'm fairly sure I thought of a 3rd way to cure things, but now that
I'm writing things down I cannot seem to remember :/ -- could be we muck
with wait_task_inactive().

In any case, I hate all of them, but I think the completion one is the
least horrible because it gives the strongest guarantees and cleans up
most. But promoting TASK_PARKED to special certainly is the earier
patch.

The below boots, but that's about all I did with it. Opinions?

---

--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
  int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k);
  void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *k);
  void kthread_parkme(void);
+void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k);
int kthreadd(void *unused);
  extern struct task_struct *kthreadd_task;
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
        KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU = 0,
        KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP,
        KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK,
-       KTHREAD_IS_PARKED,
  };
static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
@@ -177,14 +176,12 @@ void *kthread_probe_data(struct task_str
static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self)
  {
-       __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
-       while (test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) {
-               if (!test_and_set_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags))
-                       complete(&self->parked);
+       for (;;) {
+               set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
+               if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags))
+                       break;
                schedule();
-               __set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
        }
-       clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &self->flags);
        __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
  }
@@ -194,6 +191,11 @@ void kthread_parkme(void)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_parkme);
+void kthread_park_complete(struct task_struct *k)
+{
+       complete(&to_kthread(k)->parked);
+}
+
  static int kthread(void *_create)
  {
        /* Copy data: it's on kthread's stack */
@@ -450,22 +452,15 @@ void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *
  {
        struct kthread *kthread = to_kthread(k);
- clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
        /*
-        * We clear the IS_PARKED bit here as we don't wait
-        * until the task has left the park code. So if we'd
-        * park before that happens we'd see the IS_PARKED bit
-        * which might be about to be cleared.
+        * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
+        * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
         */
-       if (test_and_clear_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
-               /*
-                * Newly created kthread was parked when the CPU was offline.
-                * The binding was lost and we need to set it again.
-                */
-               if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
-                       __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
-               wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
-       }
+       if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags))
+               __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED);
+
+       clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+       wake_up_state(k, TASK_PARKED);
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kthread_unpark);
@@ -488,12 +483,13 @@ int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k)
        if (WARN_ON(k->flags & PF_EXITING))
                return -ENOSYS;
- if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PARKED, &kthread->flags)) {
-               set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
-               if (k != current) {
-                       wake_up_process(k);
-                       wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
-               }
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags)))
+               return -EBUSY;
+
+       set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags);
+       if (k != current) {
+               wake_up_process(k);
+               wait_for_completion(&kthread->parked);
        }
return 0;
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
   */
  #include "sched.h"
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+
  #include <asm/switch_to.h>
  #include <asm/tlb.h>
@@ -2718,20 +2720,28 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(str
                membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(mm);
                mmdrop(mm);
        }
-       if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
-               if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
-                       prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
+       if (unlikely(prev_state & (TASK_DEAD|TASK_PARKED))) {
+               switch (prev_state) {
+               case TASK_DEAD:
+                       if (prev->sched_class->task_dead)
+                               prev->sched_class->task_dead(prev);
+
+                       /*
+                        * Remove function-return probe instances associated 
with this
+                        * task and put them back on the free list.
+                        */
+                       kprobe_flush_task(prev);
- /*
-                * Remove function-return probe instances associated with this
-                * task and put them back on the free list.
-                */
-               kprobe_flush_task(prev);
+                       /* Task is done with its stack. */
+                       put_task_stack(prev);
- /* Task is done with its stack. */
-               put_task_stack(prev);
+                       put_task_struct(prev);
+                       break;
- put_task_struct(prev);
+               case TASK_PARKED:
+                       kthread_park_complete(prev);
+                       break;
+               }
        }
tick_nohz_task_switch();


--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to