On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > > If for some reason you really can't do that (and a requirement for > > allocation-in-interrupt is the only valid reason, really) and if you indeed > > can demonstrate memory allocation failures with certain workloads then > > let's take a look at that. As I said, attaching a reserve pool to your > > slab cache might be a suitable approach. But none of these things are > > I agree. We are better off with enhancing slab infrastructure for this, if > needed.
The slab allocators already use the page allocators atomic reserves if called with GFP_ATOMIC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
