Hi!

> The trigger fires when data is pushed to the ldisc. This is a bit later
> than the actual receiving of data but has the nice benefit that it
> doesn't need adaption for each driver and isn't in the hot path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>

Well, why not, but there certainly should be config option? Because I
really don't see many people wanting to use this trigger.

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> index c996b6859c5e..4d364b77b1a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
>  
>  
>  #define MIN_TTYB_SIZE        256
> @@ -499,6 +500,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
>               struct tty_buffer *head = buf->head;
>               struct tty_buffer *next;
>               int count;
> +             unsigned long delay = 50 /* ms */;
>  
>               /* Ldisc or user is trying to gain exclusive access */
>               if (atomic_read(&buf->priority))
> @@ -521,6 +523,8 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
>                       continue;
>               }
>  
> +             led_trigger_blink_oneshot(port->led_trigger_rx, &delay, &delay, 
> 0);
> +
>               count = receive_buf(port, head, count);
>               if (!count)
>                       break;
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
> index 25d736880013..51b78a585417 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_port.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/wait.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/serdev.h>
>  
> @@ -157,6 +158,18 @@ struct device 
> *tty_port_register_device_attr_serdev(struct tty_port *port,
>  
>       tty_port_link_device(port, driver, index);
>  
> +     port->led_trigger_rx_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s%d-rx",
> +                                           driver->name, index);
> +     if (!port->led_trigger_rx_name) {
> +             pr_err("Failed to allocate trigger name for %s%d\n",
> +                    driver->name, index);
> +             goto skip_trigger;
> +     }
> +
> +     led_trigger_register_simple(port->led_trigger_rx_name,
> +                                 &port->led_trigger_rx);
> +
> +skip_trigger:
>       dev = serdev_tty_port_register(port, device, driver, index);
>       if (PTR_ERR(dev) != -ENODEV) {
>               /* Skip creating cdev if we registered a serdev device */
> @@ -206,6 +219,9 @@ void tty_port_unregister_device(struct tty_port *port,
>       if (ret == 0)
>               return;
>  
> +     led_trigger_unregister_simple(port->led_trigger_rx);

Is it ok to unregister if it was not registered in the first place?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to