On Jun 10 2007 19:52, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> > Since the common language of most kernel contributors is english I >> > personally feel that we should stick to just that one language in the >> > tree and then perhaps keep translations on a website somewhere. So the >> > authoritative docs stay in the tree, in english, so that as many >> > contributors as possible can read and update them. It would then be a >> > seperate project to generate translations and keep them updated >> > according to what's in the tree. Perhaps we could get the kernel.org >> > people to create an official space for that and then place a pointer >> > to that site in Documentation/ somewhere. >> >> No, I think the translated files should be in the tree proper, we have >> the space :) > >We once discussed about .po files for kconfig and back then >the conclusion was not to keep them in the kernel tree. > >I advocated that they should stay out back then. >But on the other hand I do not see it causing much troubles >having scripts/kconfig/po/da.po etc araound. > >Any opinion about the .po files?
Like with translated doc, they might get out of date easily. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/