On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:10:54PM +0200, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> In an SFP EEPROM values can be read to get information about a given SFP
> module. One of those is the bitrate, which can be determined using a
> nominal bitrate in addition with min and max values (in %). The SFP code
> currently compute both BR,min and BR,max values thanks to this nominal
> and min,max values.
>
> This patch fixes the BR,min computation as the min value should be
> subtracted to the nominal one, not added.
>
> Fixes: 9962acf7fb8c ("sfp: add support for 1000Base-PX and 1000Base-BX10")
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.ten...@bootlin.com>
I know David has already applied it, but for the record, your fix looks
correct, thanks.
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> index 0381da78d228..fd6c23f69c2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void sfp_parse_support(struct sfp_bus *bus, const struct
> sfp_eeprom_id *id,
> if (id->base.br_nominal) {
> if (id->base.br_nominal != 255) {
> br_nom = id->base.br_nominal * 100;
> - br_min = br_nom + id->base.br_nominal * id->ext.br_min;
> + br_min = br_nom - id->base.br_nominal * id->ext.br_min;
> br_max = br_nom + id->base.br_nominal * id->ext.br_max;
> } else if (id->ext.br_max) {
> br_nom = 250 * id->ext.br_max;
> --
> 2.17.0
>
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
