On 2018/5/8 20:56, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Stanimir, Jianguo, Shawn for qcom, histb comments below]
> 
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:03:48PM +0800, Yao Chen wrote:
>> This patch adds kirin pcie msi feature.
> 
> Thanks for the patch!  Please update your subject and changelog like this:
> 
>   PCI: kirin: Add MSI support
> 
>   Add support for MSI.
> 
> You can figure out what style to use for the subject by running:
> 
>   git log --oneline drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> 
> Then follow the existing style.
> 

Ok, I will update the style of subject and changelog.

>> Signed-off-by: Yao Chen <chenya...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3660.dtsi |  2 ++
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c              | 38 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3660.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3660.dtsi
>> index ec3eb8e..4ef684f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3660.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi3660.dtsi
>> @@ -872,6 +872,8 @@
>>                                0x0 0x02000000>;
>>                      num-lanes = <1>;
>>                      #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> +                    interrupts = <0 283 4>;
>> +                    interrupts-names = "msi";
>>                      interrupt-map-mask = <0xf800 0 0 7>;
>>                      interrupt-map = <0x0 0 0 1
>>                                       &gic GIC_SPI 282 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> index d2970a0..2319c9c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
>> @@ -426,9 +426,28 @@ static int kirin_pcie_establish_link(struct pcie_port 
>> *pp)
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static irqreturn_t kirin_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>> +{
>> +    struct pcie_port *pp = arg;
>> +
>> +    return dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kirin_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> +    dw_pcie_msi_init(pp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kirin_pcie_enable_interrupts(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
>> +            kirin_pcie_msi_init(pp);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int kirin_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  {
>>      kirin_pcie_establish_link(pp);
>> +    kirin_pcie_enable_interrupts(pp);
>>  
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -448,6 +467,25 @@ static int kirin_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>  static int __init kirin_add_pcie_port(struct dw_pcie *pci,
>>                                    struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
>> +            pci->pp.msi_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> +            if (!pci->pp.msi_irq) {
>> +                    dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get msi irq\n");
> 
> s/msi irq/MSI IRQ/
> 
>> +                    return -ENODEV;
>> +            }
>> +            ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pci->pp.msi_irq,
>> +                                   kirin_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
>> +                                   IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>> +                                   "kirin_pcie_msi", &pci->pp);
>> +            if (ret) {
>> +                    dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request msi irq\n");
> 
> s/msi irq/MSI IRQ/
> Also, please include the IRQ number (pci->pp.msi_irq) in the message.
> 
Ok, I will add msi_irq message.

>> +                    return ret;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    pci->pp.root_bus_nr = -1;
> 
> Setting root_bus_nr looks like an unrelated change that should be in a
> separate patch.
> 
> But I'm not sure why you need to set root_bus_nr at all, since
> dw_pcie_host_init() always sets it.
> 
> Some other callers of dw_pcie_host_init() do set it:
> 
>   exynos_add_pcie_port()
>   imx6_add_pcie_port()
>   armada8k_add_pcie_port()
>   artpec6_add_pcie_port()
>   dw_plat_add_pcie_port()
>   histb_pcie_probe()
>   qcom_pcie_probe()
>   spear13xx_add_pcie_port()
> 
> But I don't see *why* any of these need to set it.  If they don't need to
> set it, they shouldn't.
> 
> And it would be nice if histb and qcom followed the structure and naming
> conventions of the other drivers, i.e., they should have
> histb_add_pcie_port() and qcom_add_pcie_port().
> 

You're right, "pci->pp.root_bus_nr = -1;" is truly unnecessary. I will delete 
it.

>>      pci->pp.ops = &kirin_pcie_host_ops;
>>  
>>      return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> .
> 
Thanks,
Yao

Reply via email to