In the for-loop test, ret will be either 0 or 1. So, the
comparison is pointless. Drop it, and drop the initializer
which is then also pointless.

Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c 
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
index 51d93b4b00f2..d848cf515234 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ static int osif_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct 
i2c_msg *msgs,
 {
        struct osif_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data;
        struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret;
        int i;
 
-       for (i = 0; ret >= 0 && i < num; i++) {
+       for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
                pmsg = &msgs[i];
 
                if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to