On (05/11/18 10:51), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> In general, the idea looks OK to me, so FWIW
> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com>
Looking at dmesg,
Base:
[ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
[ 0.000000] Intel GenuineIntel
[...]
[ 0.000000] 00000-9FFFF write-back
[ 0.000000] A0000-BFFFF uncachable
[ 0.000000] C0000-FFFFF write-protect
[ 0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
[ 0.000000] 0 base 00E0000000 mask 7FE0000000 uncachable
[ 0.000000] 1 disabled
[ 0.000000] 2 disabled
[ 0.000000] 3 disabled
[ 0.000000] 4 disabled
[..]
Patched:
[ 0.000000] common: KERNEL supported cpus:
[ 0.000000] common: Intel GenuineIntel
[...]
[ 0.000000] generic: MTRR default type: write-back
[ 0.000000] generic: MTRR fixed ranges enabled:
[ 0.000000] generic: 00000-9FFFF write-back
[ 0.000000] generic: A0000-BFFFF uncachable
[ 0.000000] generic: C0000-FFFFF write-protect
[ 0.000000] generic: MTRR variable ranges enabled:
[ 0.000000] generic: 0 base 00E0000000 mask 7FE0000000 uncachable
[ 0.000000] generic: 1 disabled
[ 0.000000] generic: 2 disabled
[ 0.000000] generic: 3 disabled
[ 0.000000] generic: 4 disabled
[..]
Is it correct that WARN_ON() from "generic: " will now also be prefixed?
In other words, we will have something like this
[ 28.420519] generic: RSP: 0018:ffffa01dc062bda8 EFLAGS: 00010282
[ 28.420522] generic: RAX: ffffffff8317612f RBX: ffffffffffffffea RCX:
ffffa01dc062bdc8
[ 28.420523] generic: RDX: 000055a6a3f03110 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:
ffffffff83e31540
[ 28.420525] generic: RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffa01dc062bec0 R09:
0000000000000004
[ 28.420526] generic: R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
0000000000000001
[ 28.420528] generic: R13: ffffffff83e31540 R14: ffffa01dc062bec0 R15:
0000000000000002
[ 28.420547] generic: ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5d/0x63
[ 28.420549] generic: ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2e/0x54
[ 28.420551] generic: ? __sb_start_write+0xeb/0x1a3
Correct?
-ss
