We expect a quiescent state of TASKS_RCU when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs()
is called, no matter whether it actually be scheduled or not. However,
it currently doesn't report the quiescent state when the task enters
into __schedule() as it's called with preempt = true. So make it report
the quiescent state unconditionally when cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() is
called.

And in TINY_RCU, even though the quiescent state of rcu_bh also should
be reported when the tick interrupt comes from user, it doesn't. So make
it reported.

Lastly in TREE_RCU, rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() should be
reported when the tick interrupt comes from not only user but also idle,
as an extended quiescent state.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++--
 kernel/rcu/tiny.c        | 6 +++---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index ee8cf5fc..7432261 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
  */
 #define cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() \
 do { \
-       if (!cond_resched()) \
-               rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(current); \
+       rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(current); \
+       cond_resched(); \
 } while (0)
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index a64eee0..68d2332 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -120,12 +120,12 @@ void rcu_bh_qs(void)
  */
 void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
 {
-       if (user)
+       if (user) {
                rcu_sched_qs();
-       else if (!in_softirq())
                rcu_bh_qs();
-       if (user)
                rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
+       } else if (!in_softirq())
+               rcu_bh_qs();
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 36075dd..1abe29a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2595,6 +2595,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
 
                rcu_sched_qs();
                rcu_bh_qs();
+               rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
 
        } else if (!in_softirq()) {
 
@@ -2610,8 +2611,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int user)
        rcu_preempt_check_callbacks();
        if (rcu_pending())
                invoke_rcu_core();
-       if (user)
-               rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
+
        trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End scheduler-tick"));
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to