On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:15:39PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > >> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With > >> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel > >> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem. > > > > So these are being proposed for 2.6.22? > > Yeap. > > > I do wonder about Rafael's bug which he bisected down to > > gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch. > > > > If that won't be a problem in this patchset then I spose it's probably best > > to go ahead with a 2.6.22 merge, but it's more a Greg thing than a me > > thing. > > I'm currently debugging that and it's irrelevant to these fixes. The > bug is introduced far after the fixes. > > > I don't have a tree to merge these patches into, unless I drop all the > > patches which are in Greg's tree. > > > > Greg, can I leave it up to you to decide how we are to proceed here?
Ok, I'll test them out, and if look sane pass them to Linus. > I can rebase all sysfs patches in -mm on top of linus#master + these > fixes if necessary. Yeah, I'll need that if these look good enough, otherwise my tree will stop applying :) Give me some time tonight to do this... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/