On Tue, 15 May 2018 15:31:37 -0700
Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> > we could always do this:  
> 
> Ugh. I think I prefer the barriers.

But the ugliness is only at boot up, where the early printing is
important. The benefit of this is here:

@@ -1709,7 +1717,7 @@ static char *ptr_to_id(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, 
struct printf_spec spec)
        unsigned long hashval;
        const int default_width = 2 * sizeof(ptr);
 
-       if (unlikely(!have_filled_random_ptr_key)) {
+       if (static_branch_unlikely(&not_filled_random_ptr_key)) {
                spec.field_width = default_width;
                /* string length must be less than default_width */
                return string(buf, end, "(ptrval)", spec);

Because not only do we not add any barriers, this code basically
becomes a nop once the ptr_key is filled, and this should have a small
speed up in execution (although I have not done any benchmarks).

-- Steve

Reply via email to