On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote: > * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> [180516 10:49]: >> On 2018-05-16 13:17:36 [+0300], Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > > The output is usually short so there >> > > shouldn't be much benefit from using it. >> > >> > > I remember Tony wanted runtime-pm on the kernel console, too. And he >> > > told me explicit how to test it so that it works. Once the UART goes >> > > into PM (down), the whole IP block can go into power save mode. The >> > > board can be woken up by sending a character via the UART. The first few >> > > (incoming / read) characters are lost until the IP block is up again the >> > > frequency stable. This is known / expected. >> > >> > Don't consider world the OMAP only. The things more complicated if we >> > go out of it. Which I tried to explain in the commit message of patch >> > 2. >> >> I am not saying the world is OMAP only. I just tried to explain how any >> why it got there and its purpose. I haven't NACKed it. I would believe >> that with that information and Tony not defending his use case or >> possible change it somehow so it is not standing in your way, Greg would >> have enough information to go your way. > > The idea breaking PM seems silly to me considering that we've had > it working for years already.
Same question / note. World is much more complex than just being OMAP. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
