On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:00:29AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:33:09PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > +#define DBG(x...) do { } while(0)
>
> Eh... Please, stop it - if you want a function-call-like no-op returning
> void,
> use ((void)0). At least that way one can say DBG(....),foo(), etc.
They both end up compiled to nothing anyway, so I'm not bothered
either way.. I'm not sure I follow why the syntax of that last part
is a good thing. It looks like something we'd want to avoid rather
than promote?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
