* Linus Torvalds: > I consider dual-licensing unlikely (and technically quite hard), but at > least _possible_ in theory. I have yet to see any actual *reasons* for > licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about > "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok)
In a strange twist, the last-call draft contains a clause that expressly permits some forms of "tivoization", provided a suitable contractual arrangement exists ("Basic Permissions", second paragraph). Now a lot of the free software market follows this "sell yourself into slavery" model (and even the FSF recommends to make money this way), but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to state it so plainly in the license. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/