On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 08:05:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We now have error handling in map_single/map_page callers (most of them

Which ones are missing? Shouldn't we first fix those before we rip this out?

> anyway). As swiotlb_tbl_map_single already prints a useful warning
> when running out of swiotlb pool swace we can also remove swiotlb_full

s/swace/so/

> entirely as it serves no purpose now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
>  lib/swiotlb.c | 33 +--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> index 721f93677eee..4d36340bc4f9 100644
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -763,34 +763,6 @@ static bool swiotlb_free_buffer(struct device *dev, 
> size_t size,
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> -static void
> -swiotlb_full(struct device *dev, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> -          int do_panic)
> -{
> -     if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
> -             return;
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Ran out of IOMMU space for this operation. This is very bad.
> -      * Unfortunately the drivers cannot handle this operation properly.
> -      * unless they check for dma_mapping_error (most don't)
> -      * When the mapping is small enough return a static buffer to limit
> -      * the damage, or panic when the transfer is too big.
> -      */
> -     dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "DMA: Out of SW-IOMMU space for %zu bytes\n",
> -                         size);
> -
> -     if (size <= io_tlb_overflow || !do_panic)
> -             return;
> -
> -     if (dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)
> -             panic("DMA: Random memory could be DMA accessed\n");
> -     if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
> -             panic("DMA: Random memory could be DMA written\n");
> -     if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
> -             panic("DMA: Random memory could be DMA read\n");
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Map a single buffer of the indicated size for DMA in streaming mode.  The
>   * physical address to use is returned.
> @@ -819,10 +791,8 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct 
> page *page,
>  
>       /* Oh well, have to allocate and map a bounce buffer. */
>       map = map_single(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
> -     if (map == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR) {
> -             swiotlb_full(dev, size, dir, 1);
> +     if (map == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR)
>               return __phys_to_dma(dev, io_tlb_overflow_buffer);
> -     }
>  
>       dev_addr = __phys_to_dma(dev, map);
>  
> @@ -950,7 +920,6 @@ swiotlb_map_sg_attrs(struct device *hwdev, struct 
> scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
>                       if (map == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR) {
>                               /* Don't panic here, we expect map_sg users
>                                  to do proper error handling. */
> -                             swiotlb_full(hwdev, sg->length, dir, 0);
>                               attrs |= DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
>                               swiotlb_unmap_sg_attrs(hwdev, sgl, i, dir,
>                                                      attrs);
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 

Reply via email to