4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> commit b849a812f7eb92e96d1c8239b06581b2cfd8b275 upstream Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE in seccomp() because seccomp does not allow to widen restrictions. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> --- kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which); if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL)) - arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE); + arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE); } static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task,