On 22/05/18 07:56, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 16:05

[...]

>>
>>
>> That may be true and I am not that bothered about it. But assuming physical
>> ordering from the logical cpu number is *incorrect* and will break if kernel
>> decides to change the allocation algorithm. Kernel provides no guarantee on
>> that, so you need to depend on some physical ID or may be DT to achieve
>> what your want. But the current code as it stands is wrong.
> 
> Got your point. In fact CPUs are numbered 0-3 and ordered into 2 clusters in 
> the DT:
> 
> cpus {
>       #address-cells = <2>;
>       #size-cells = <0>;
> 
>       CPU0: cpu@0 {
>               ...
>               reg = <0x0 0x0>;
>               ...
>       };
> 
>       CPU1: cpu@1 {
>               ...
>               reg = <0x0 0x1>;
>               ...
>       };
> 
>       CPU2: cpu@100 {
>               ...
>               reg = <0x0 0x100>;
>               ...
>       };
> 
>       CPU3: cpu@101 {
>               ...
>               reg = <0x0 0x101>;
>               ...
>       };
> 
>       cpu-map {
>               cluster0 {
>                       core0 {
>                               cpu = <&CPU0>;
>                       };
> 
>                       core1 {
>                               cpu = <&CPU1>;
>                       };
>               };
> 
>               cluster1 {
>                       core0 {
>                               cpu = <&CPU2>;
>                       };
> 
>                       core1 {
>                               cpu = <&CPU3>;
>                       };
>               };
>       };
> };
> 
> As far, as I understand, they are probed in the same order. 

Yes that's correct today, will that have to remain same for ever ?
No it's not user ABI and kernel can decide to change the allocation
order. What if for some reason one/more CPUs fails to boot or even
configured not to boot ?

> However, to be certain that the physical CPU is the one I intend to
> configure, I have to fetch the device structure pointer for the cpu-map ->
> clusterX -> core0 -> cpu path. Could you suggest a kernel API to do
> that?
> 

Let's rewind a bit. Do you supply OPPs only on CPU0 and CPU2 ?
If yes, that's again wrong. Simple solution is to parse all logical
CPUs and skip if the share OPPs with some other CPUs. I think that
logic already exists in OPP library IIRC.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Reply via email to