"Peter Samuelson wrote:"
> [Michael Warfield]
> > This thing is not armed and dangerous due to an act of ommision.
> > It's live and active only through three acts of commision.
>
> We could make it *four* acts of commission. (: (: (:
>
> diff -urk~ fs/Config.in
> --- fs/Config.in~ Mon Nov 13 01:43:42 2000
> +++ fs/Config.in Thu Dec 7 23:00:34 2000
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
> tristate 'Minix fs support' CONFIG_MINIX_FS
>
> tristate 'NTFS file system support (read only)' CONFIG_NTFS_FS
> -dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_NTFS_FS
>$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> +dep_mbool ' NTFS write support (DANGEROUS)' CONFIG_MORON $CONFIG_NTFS_FS
>$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> +dep_bool ' Are you sure? I hope you dont care about your NTFS filesystems'
>CONFIG_NTFS_RW $CONFIG_MORON
>
> tristate 'OS/2 HPFS file system support' CONFIG_HPFS_FS
Of course, you know that it *WILL NOT* work as CONFIG_MORON is nowhere
defined ... ?
Andrzej
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Technical University of Gdansk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
