> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 16:25
> To: Ilia Lin <ilia...@codeaurora.org>; vire...@kernel.org; n...@ti.com;
> sb...@kernel.org; r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> r...@rjwysocki.net; linux...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] cpufreq: Add Kryo CPU scaling driver
>
>
>
> On 23/05/18 13:38, Ilia Lin wrote:
> > In Certain QCOM SoCs like apq8096 and msm8996 that have KRYO
> > processors, the CPU frequency subset and voltage value of each OPP
> > varies based on the silicon variant in use. Qualcomm Process Voltage
> > Scaling Tables defines the voltage and frequency value based on the
> > msm-id in SMEM and speedbin blown in the efuse combination.
> > The qcom-cpufreq-kryo driver reads the msm-id and efuse value from the
> > SoC to provide the OPP framework with required information.
> > This is used to determine the voltage and frequency value for each OPP
> > of
> > operating-points-v2 table when it is parsed by the OPP framework.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilia Lin <ilia...@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 10 ++
> > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 3 +
> > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c | 181
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-kryo.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > index de55c7d..0bfd40e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> > @@ -124,6 +124,16 @@ config ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ
> > depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> > default ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> >
> > +config ARM_QCOM_CPUFREQ_KRYO
> > + bool "Qualcomm Kryo based CPUFreq"
> > + depends on QCOM_QFPROM
> > + depends on QCOM_SMEM
> > + select PM_OPP
> > + help
> > + This adds the CPUFreq driver for Qualcomm Kryo SoC based boards.
> > +
> > + If in doubt, say N.
> > +
>
> Sorry but just noticed now, any reason why this can't be module. I can't
> imagine any.
I was asked previously to change this from tristate to bool.
>
> [..]
>
> > +static int qcom_cpufreq_kryo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + struct opp_table *opp_tables[NR_CPUS] = {0};
> > + struct platform_device *cpufreq_dt_pdev;
> > + enum _msm8996_version msm8996_version;
> > + struct nvmem_cell *speedbin_nvmem;
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + struct device *cpu_dev;
>
> [..]
>
> > +
> > + cpufreq_dt_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -
> 1, NULL, 0);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(cpufreq_dt_pdev))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(cpufreq_dt_pdev);
> > + dev_err(cpu_dev, "Failed to register platform device\n");
> > +
> > +free_opp:
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(opp_tables[cpu]))
> > + break;
> > + dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw(opp_tables[cpu]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init(void) {
> > + /*
> > + * Since the driver depends on smem and nvmem drivers, which may
> > + * return EPROBE_DEFER, all the real activity is done in the probe,
> > + * which may be defered as well. The init here is only registering
> > + * a platform device.
> > + */
> > + platform_device_register_simple("qcom-cpufreq-kryo", -1, NULL, 0);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +module_init(qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init);
>
> Do you need this at all ? See below on how to eliminate the need for this.
>
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver qcom_cpufreq_kryo_driver = {
> > + .probe = qcom_cpufreq_kryo_probe,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "qcom-cpufreq-kryo",
> > + },
> > +};
> > +builtin_platform_driver(qcom_cpufreq_kryo_driver);
>
> Use builtin_platform_driver_probe and remove qcom_cpufreq_kryo_init or
> use module_platform_driver_probe if it can be module.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
