On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 12:01:30 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This routine checks if the CPU running this code belongs to the policy
> of the target CPU or if not, can it do remote DVFS for it remotely. But
> the current name of it implies as if it is only about doing remote
> updates.
>
> Rename it to make it more relevant.
>
> Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> index ca38229b045a..871bf9cf55cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static void dbs_update_util_handler(struct
> update_util_data *data, u64 time,
> struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
> u64 delta_ns, lst;
>
> - if (!cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(policy_dbs->policy))
> + if (!cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(policy_dbs->policy))
> return;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 87f48dd932eb..882a9b9e34bc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ struct governor_attr {
> size_t count);
> };
>
> -static inline bool cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +static inline bool cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> /*
> * Allow remote callbacks if:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 2442decbfec7..2145655dbd9e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy
> *sg_policy, u64 time)
> * schedule the kthread.
> */
> if (sg_policy->policy->fast_switch_enabled &&
> - !cpufreq_can_do_remote_dvfs(sg_policy->policy))
> + !cpufreq_this_cpu_can_update(sg_policy->policy))
> return false;
>
> if (sg_policy->work_in_progress)
>
Applied, thanks!
