On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:58:13AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > We all basically knew this would be your position. But at this year's > LSF we pretty quickly reached consensus that we do in fact need this. > Except for yourself, Sagi and afaik Martin George: all on the cc were in > attendance and agreed.
And I very mich disagree, and you'd bette come up with a good reason to overide me as the author and maintainer of this code. > And since then we've exchanged mails to refine and test Johannes' > implementation. Since when was acting behind the scenes a good argument for anything? > Hopefully this clarifies things, thanks. It doesn't. The whole point we have native multipath in nvme is because dm-multipath is the wrong architecture (and has been, long predating you, nothing personal). And I don't want to be stuck additional decades with this in nvme. We allowed a global opt-in to ease the three people in the world with existing setups to keep using that, but I also said I won't go any step further. And I stand to that.