4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit bf617f7a92edc6bb2909db2bfa4576f50b280ee5 ]
If noextent_cache mount option is on, we will never initialize extent tree
in inode, but still we're going to access it in f2fs_drop_extent_tree,
result in kernel panic as below:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038
IP: _raw_write_lock+0xc/0x30
Call Trace:
? f2fs_drop_extent_tree+0x41/0x70 [f2fs]
f2fs_fallocate+0x5a0/0xdd0 [f2fs]
? common_file_perm+0x47/0xc0
? apparmor_file_permission+0x1a/0x20
vfs_fallocate+0x15b/0x290
SyS_fallocate+0x44/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x160
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
This patch fixes to check extent cache status before using in
f2fs_drop_extent_tree.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -706,6 +706,9 @@ void f2fs_drop_extent_tree(struct inode
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree;
+ if (!f2fs_may_extent_tree(inode))
+ return;
+
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
write_lock(&et->lock);
