sig_handler_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
actually declare it as such too.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io>
---
v0->v1:
* patch introduced
---
 kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index faef85bb243e..78a9b32785df 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static void __user *sig_handler(struct task_struct *t, int 
sig)
        return t->sighand->action[sig - 1].sa.sa_handler;
 }
 
-static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
+static inline bool sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
 {
        /* Is it explicitly or implicitly ignored? */
        return handler == SIG_IGN ||
-               (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
+              (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
 static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
-- 
2.17.0

Reply via email to