Hello Paul and folks,

I've thought the code should've been like the below since the range
checking of jiffies_till_first_fqs and jiffies_till_next_fqs everytime
in the loop of rcu_gp_kthread are unnecessary at all. However, it's ok
even if you don't think it's worth doing it.

Secondly, I also think jiffies_till_first_fqs = 0 is meaningless so
added checking and adjusting it as what's done on jiffies_till_next_fqs.
Thought?

Thank you in advance.
Byungchul

----->8-----
>From 67fecc15b44b2521de96de109782c04ce65afb85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 15:49:26 +0900
Subject: [RFC] rcu: Check the range of jiffies_till_xxx_fqs on setting them

Currently, the range of jiffies_till_first_fqs and jiffies_till_next_fqs
are always checked and adjusted in the loop of rcu_gp_kthread on runtime.
However, it would be better and enough to check them only on setting
them, so remove unnecessary checking and adjusting in the loop.

Additionally, add adjusting jiffies_till_first_fqs so guaranteed to be
greater than 0, which hasn't been done before.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4e96761..4964237 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -518,8 +518,31 @@ void rcu_all_qs(void)
 static ulong jiffies_till_next_fqs = ULONG_MAX;
 static bool rcu_kick_kthreads;
 
-module_param(jiffies_till_first_fqs, ulong, 0644);
-module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, 0644);
+static int param_set_fqs_jiffies(const char *val, const struct kernel_param 
*kp)
+{
+       ulong tmp;
+       int ret = kstrtoul(val, 0, &tmp);
+
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       if (tmp > HZ)
+               tmp = HZ;
+       else if (tmp < 1)
+               tmp = 1;
+
+       /* Prevent tearing */
+       WRITE_ONCE(*(ulong *)kp->arg, tmp);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kernel_param_ops fqs_jiffies_ops = {
+       .set = param_set_fqs_jiffies,
+       .get = param_get_ulong,
+};
+
+module_param_cb(jiffies_till_first_fqs, &fqs_jiffies_ops, 
&jiffies_till_first_fqs, 0644);
+module_param_cb(jiffies_till_next_fqs, &fqs_jiffies_ops, 
&jiffies_till_next_fqs, 0644);
 module_param(rcu_kick_kthreads, bool, 0644);
 
 /*
@@ -2129,10 +2152,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
                /* Handle quiescent-state forcing. */
                first_gp_fqs = true;
                j = jiffies_till_first_fqs;
-               if (j > HZ) {
-                       j = HZ;
-                       jiffies_till_first_fqs = HZ;
-               }
                ret = 0;
                for (;;) {
                        if (!ret) {
@@ -2167,13 +2186,6 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
                                WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity, jiffies);
                                ret = 0; /* Force full wait till next FQS. */
                                j = jiffies_till_next_fqs;
-                               if (j > HZ) {
-                                       j = HZ;
-                                       jiffies_till_next_fqs = HZ;
-                               } else if (j < 1) {
-                                       j = 1;
-                                       jiffies_till_next_fqs = 1;
-                               }
                        } else {
                                /* Deal with stray signal. */
                                cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to