Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is > flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.
My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable. We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns. Thanks, Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
