On Sat 02-06-18 19:58:51, ufo19890...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: yuzhoujian <yuzhouj...@didichuxing.com>
> 
> This patch will make some preparation for the follow-up patch: Refactor
> part of the oom report in dump_header. It puts enum oom_constraint in
> memcontrol.h and adds an array of const char for each constraint.

I do not get why you separate this specific part out.
oom_constraint_text is not used in the patch. It is almost always
preferable to have a user of newly added functionality.

> 
> Signed-off-by: yuzhoujian <yuzhouj...@didichuxing.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  mm/oom_kill.c              |  7 -------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index d99b71bc2c66..57311b6c4d67 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -62,6 +62,20 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie {
>       unsigned int generation;
>  };
>  
> +enum oom_constraint {
> +     CONSTRAINT_NONE,
> +     CONSTRAINT_CPUSET,
> +     CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
> +     CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const oom_constraint_text[] = {
> +     [CONSTRAINT_NONE] = "CONSTRAINT_NONE",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_CPUSET] = "CONSTRAINT_CPUSET",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY",
> +     [CONSTRAINT_MEMCG] = "CONSTRAINT_MEMCG",
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>  
>  #define MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT  16
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 8ba6cb88cf58..c806cd656af6 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,6 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct 
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
>       return points > 0 ? points : 1;
>  }
>  
> -enum oom_constraint {
> -     CONSTRAINT_NONE,
> -     CONSTRAINT_CPUSET,
> -     CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY,
> -     CONSTRAINT_MEMCG,
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Determine the type of allocation constraint.
>   */
> -- 
> 2.14.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to