Daniel Hazelton wrote > If "DRM" was against the license then an extra section clearly > explaining that could have been added. (in the DRM case I actually > understand the reasoning and agree with it.)
Changing licenses is not like changing software code, re-licensing is a major hassle so "release early, release often" is not a viable strategy. That means GPL v3 is not a nice localised incremental patch but a huge patchset on all the issues that have accumulated since GPLv2 was written (and one can discuss the correctness of parts of this patchset) -- Nicolas Mailhot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
