On 05/06/18 16:11, Patrick Bellasi wrote: [...]
> If I run an experiment with your example above, while using the > performance governor to rule out any possible scale invariance > difference, here is what I measure: > > Task1 (40ms delayed by the following Task2): > mean std max > running_avg 455.387449 22.940168 492.0 > util_avg 433.233288 17.395477 458.0 > > Task2 (waking up at same time of Task1 and running before): > mean std max > running_avg 430.281834 22.405175 455.0 > util_avg 421.745331 22.098873 456.0 > > and if I compare Task1 above with another experiment where Task1 is > running alone: > > Task1 (running alone): > mean std min > running_avg 460.257895 22.103704 460.0 > util_avg 435.119737 17.647556 461.0 Wait, why again in this last case running_avg != util_avg? :)
