On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 01:09:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:14:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09:51AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> > There are macros for static initializer for the three out of four
> >> >> > possible notifier types, that are:
> >> >> >         ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >         BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >         RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD()
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This patch provides a static initilizer for the forth type to make it
> >> >> > complete.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
> >> >>
> >> >> I cannot apply this without an ACK from Paul.
> >> >
> >> > I have both queued, but if you would prefer to take them, then for the
> >> > SRCU piece:
> >> >
> >> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> I'll route them along with the other cpufreq material then.
> >
> > Please let me know when you have them queued so that I can remove
> > them from -rcu.
> 
> I've just added them to my linux-next branch.

And I have removed them, thank you!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

Reply via email to