4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>

[ Upstream commit f8f4bef322e4600c5856911c7a632c0e3da920d6 ]

When dealing with ingress rule on a netdev, if we did fine through the
conventional path, there's no need to continue into the egdev route,
and we can stop right there.

Not doing so may cause a 2nd rule to be added by the cls api layer
with the ingress being the egdev.

For example, under sriov switchdev scheme, a user rule of VFR A --> VFR B
will end up with two HW rules (1) VF A --> VF B and (2) uplink --> VF B

Fixes: 208c0f4b5237 ('net: sched: use tc_setup_cb_call to call per-block 
callbacks')
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ int tc_setup_cb_call(struct tcf_block *b
                return ret;
        ok_count = ret;
 
-       if (!exts)
+       if (!exts || ok_count)
                return ok_count;
        ret = tc_exts_setup_cb_egdev_call(exts, type, type_data, err_stop);
        if (ret < 0)


Reply via email to