On Monday, June 4, 2018 9:11:41 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 01-06-18, 14:05, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> >
> > The function acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch is local to the source and does
> > not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:468:14: warning: symbol
> > 'acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > index 9449657d72f0..32ba4bc972e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -465,8 +465,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy
> > *policy,
> > return result;
> > }
> >
> > -unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > - unsigned int target_freq)
> > +static unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > + unsigned int target_freq)
> > {
> > struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
> > struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
>
>
Patch applied, thanks!
