On Mon 2018-06-18 15:39:16, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (04/25/18 16:48), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > So I agree that printk_safe context does not help much. And I fine > > with this patch. > > > > Petr, do you want me to resend the patch with the updated commit message?
I am sorry for abandoning this patch. Hmm, I am a bit unsure about it now. The printk_safe context partly prevents recursion problems when console drivers print messages. I expected that this patch would have been pushed together with a better solution for the recursion. But we still do not have any. Would you mind to keep it on hold for now? I know that it might help in some situations. But it also makes the code more complicated and there is some risk of a regression. I would prefer when it is pushed in a situation when it is a clear win. Best Regards, Petr
