On 20/06/2018 12:07:00+0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > +static int tcb_clkevt_next_event(unsigned long delta,
> > > > +                                struct clock_event_device *d)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       u32 old, next, cur;
> > > > +
> > > > +       old = readl(tc.base + ATMEL_TC_CV(tc.channels[0]));
> > > > +       next = old + delta;
> > > > +       writel(next, tc.base + ATMEL_TC_RC(tc.channels[0]));
> > > > +       cur = readl(tc.base + ATMEL_TC_CV(tc.channels[0]));
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* check whether the delta elapsed while setting the register */
> > > > +       if ((next < old && cur < old && cur > next) ||
> > > > +           (next > old && (cur < old || cur > next))) {
> > > > +               /*
> > > > +                * Clear the CPCS bit in the status register to avoid
> > > > +                * generating a spurious interrupt next time a valid
> > > > +                * timer event is configured.
> > > > +                */
> > > > +               old = readl(tc.base + ATMEL_TC_SR(tc.channels[0]));
> > > > +               return -ETIME;
> > > > +       }
> > > 
> > > Aarg. Doesn;t that timer block have a simple count down and fire mode?
> > > These compare equal timers suck.
> > 
> > It only counts up...
> 
> Have you tried to play with that waveform stuff?
> 

There are only a count up and count up then down modes. As the counter
value is in a read only register, the only configurable starting value
is 0 so it will always start by counting up. I'm pretty sure the up/down
mode will not help us.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Reply via email to