On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:22:52AM +0100, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 PM, Okash Khawaja <o...@fb.com> wrote:
> > 
> > This patch modifies `bpftool map dump [-j|-p] id <map-id>` to json-
> > print and pretty-json-print map dump. It calls btf_dumper introduced in
> > previous patch to accomplish this.
> > 
> > The patch only prints debug info when -j or -p flags are supplied. Then
> > too, if the map has associated btf data loaded. Otherwise the usual
> > debug-less output is printed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Okash Khawaja <o...@fb.com>
> > Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c |   94 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> > @@ -43,9 +43,13 @@
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > 
> > #include <bpf.h>
> > 
> > +#include "json_writer.h"
> > +#include "btf.h"
> > +#include "btf_dumper.h"
> > #include "main.h"
> > 
> > static const char * const map_type_name[] = {
> > @@ -508,6 +512,83 @@ static int do_show(int argc, char **argv
> >     return errno == ENOENT ? 0 : -1;
> > }
> > 
> > +
> > +static int do_dump_btf(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_map_info *map_info,
> > +           void *key, void *value)
> > +{
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
> > +   jsonw_name(json_wtr, "key");
> > +
> > +   ret = btf_dumper_type(btf, json_wtr, map_info->btf_key_type_id, key);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           goto out;
> > +
> > +   jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
> > +
> > +   jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
> > +   jsonw_name(json_wtr, "value");
> > +
> > +   ret = btf_dumper_type(btf, json_wtr, map_info->btf_value_type_id,
> > +                   value);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +   /* end of root object */
> > +   jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
> > +
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Please add some tests for do_dump_btf(), including some invalid data 
> type/kind.
Sure. I was wondering if we can follow this up with tests afterwards.
However if they are essential now, I can add them.

> 
> > +
> > +static struct btf *get_btf(struct bpf_map_info *map_info)
> > +{
> > +   int btf_fd = bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(map_info->btf_id);
> > +   struct bpf_btf_info btf_info = { 0 };
> > +   __u32 len = sizeof(btf_info);
> > +   uint32_t last_size;
> > +   int err;
> > +   struct btf *btf = NULL;
> > +   void *ptr = NULL, *temp_ptr;
> > +
> > +   if (btf_fd < 0)
> > +           return NULL;
> > +
> > +   btf_info.btf_size = 4096;
> 
> Is btf_size always a constant of 4096? 
We start out with 4096 and in the loop below we increase the size if
needed. It seems like a sane valeu to start with. However if there are
better ideas for start value, we can discuss them.

> 
> > +   do {
> > +           last_size = btf_info.btf_size;
> > +           temp_ptr = realloc(ptr, last_size);
> > +           if (!temp_ptr) {
> > +                   p_err("unable allocate memory for debug info.");
> > +                   goto exit_free;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           ptr = temp_ptr;
> > +           bzero(ptr, last_size);
> > +           btf_info.btf = ptr_to_u64(ptr);
> > +           err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(btf_fd, &btf_info, &len);
> > +   } while (!err && btf_info.btf_size > last_size && last_size == 4096);
> > +
> > +   if (err || btf_info.btf_size > last_size) {
> > +           p_info("can't get btf info. debug info won't be displayed. 
> > error: %s",
> > +                           err ? strerror(errno) : "exceeds size retry");
> > +           goto exit_free;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   btf = btf__new((uint8_t *) btf_info.btf,
> > +                   btf_info.btf_size, NULL);
> > +   if (IS_ERR(btf)) {
> > +           printf("error when initialising btf: %s\n",
> > +                           strerror(PTR_ERR(btf)));
> > +           btf = NULL;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +exit_free:
> > +   close(btf_fd);
> > +   free(ptr);
> > +
> > +   return btf;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> >     void *key, *value, *prev_key;
> > @@ -516,6 +597,7 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv
> >     __u32 len = sizeof(info);
> >     int err;
> >     int fd;
> > +   struct btf *btf = NULL;
> > 
> >     if (argc != 2)
> >             usage();
> > @@ -538,6 +620,8 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv
> >             goto exit_free;
> >     }
> > 
> > +   btf = get_btf(&info);
> > +
> >     prev_key = NULL;
> >     if (json_output)
> >             jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
> > @@ -550,9 +634,12 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv
> >             }
> > 
> >             if (!bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, key, value)) {
> > -                   if (json_output)
> > -                           print_entry_json(&info, key, value);
> > -                   else
> > +                   if (json_output) {
> > +                           if (btf)
> > +                                   do_dump_btf(btf, &info, key, value);
> > +                           else
> > +                                   print_entry_json(&info, key, value);
> > +                   } else
> >                             print_entry_plain(&info, key, value);
> >             } else {
> >                     if (json_output) {
> > @@ -584,6 +671,7 @@ exit_free:
> >     free(key);
> >     free(value);
> >     close(fd);
> > +   btf__free(btf);
> > 
> >     return err;
> > }
> > 
> 

Reply via email to